TEN18
FINAL
24BAL
← back to predictions

Tennessee Titans vs Baltimore Ravens — Win Probability

FINAL
Tennessee Titans logo
Tennessee Titans
0-3
18
VS
Baltimore Ravens logo
Baltimore Ravens
2-1
24
Market line: BAL -11.5, total 42.5 · Model expected score: Tennessee Titans 15.5 – Baltimore Ravens 27.0
Ad space

Injury Report

The latest official designations and practice participation for both teams.

TEN
  • SKevin Winston Jr.Questionable
  • RBTyjae SpearsQuestionable
  • DEJohn Franklin-MyersFull
  • RBTony PollardFull
BAL
  • QBLamar JacksonFull
  • CEthan PocicOut
  • CJovaughn GwynOut
  • LBTrey HendricksonOut
  • WRChris MooreQuestionable
  • TRonnie StanleyQuestionable
  • WRZay FlowersQuestionable
  • TEDurham SmytheFull
  • GJohn SimpsonFull
  • TEMark AndrewsFull
  • CBMarlon HumphreyFull

Prediction vs. Result

We keep every prediction permanently so we can always show our work.

PREGAME WIN PROBABILITY
Ravens 81%
ACTUAL RESULT
Baltimore Ravens won by 6
COMBINED SCORE
42

Baltimore's 6-Point Win Fell Short of Model's 11.5-Point Projection

Baltimore defeated Tennessee 24–18 in Week 4, but the game played out significantly tighter than the model's pregame simulation suggested. The Ravens were favored to win with an 81% win probability entering the matchup, and both the model's projection and the market's betting line aligned perfectly at an 11.5-point spread in Baltimore's favor.

The model expected Baltimore to score 27 points and Tennessee to put up 15.5. The actual result—a 6-point margin with the Ravens at 24 and the Titans at 18—delivered the correct winner but underperformed the projected scoring differential by 5.5 points. Baltimore scored 3 points below its simulation, while Tennessee exceeded its expected total by 2.5 points, a combination that compressed what should have been a double-digit victory into a single-possession game.

This miss represents a meaningful gap rather than a minor variance. The model and the market were in lockstep on Baltimore's dominance, yet the Titans proved more competitive than either assessment implied. Tennessee's 18 points came closer to respectable offensive output than the 15.5 projected, though the Titans' 0–4 record after this loss underscores their broader season struggles.

For Baltimore, the win moved them to 3–1, confirming the model's identification of them as a strong team—the 81% pregame probability proved accurate in selecting the outcome. However, the narrowness of the actual margin raises a flag: the model may have overestimated Baltimore's efficiency advantage or underestimated Tennessee's ability to stay in the game despite being heavily favored. In close-call territory, this kind of compression—projection miss of 5.5 points on an 11.5-point spread—warrants attention for pattern-tracking across future games.

Ad space

Margin of Victory — Baltimore Ravens (Home)

Pregame odds for every possible outcome, simulated before kickoff -- the highlighted bar is what actually happened.

Lost / Tied
19%
Won by 1-3
7%
Won by 4-7 ← actual result
11%
Won by 8-14
21%
Won by 15-21
19%
Won by 21+
24%

Total Score — Over / Under

Combined final score against five common lines, plus this game's actual market line -- the real combined score was 42.

O/U LINE 30
82% over ✓18% under
O/U LINE 40
57% over ✓43% under
O/U LINE 42.5 MARKET LINE
50% over50% under ✓
O/U LINE 44
45% over55% under ✓
O/U LINE 48
34% over66% under ✓
O/U LINE 52
24% over76% under ✓

Projected Margin Range — Baltimore Ravens (Home)

Negative means Baltimore Ravens lost by that many points. The shaded band is the 25th–75th percentile; the dot is the median.

P05: -10
Median: +12
P95: +33

Every number above comes from the model's live prediction data — 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations, grounded in the market line at generation time.

Ad space

Highest Graded Players

Season-to-date PFF grades for each team's top graded players, minimum 25% of that side's snaps.

TEN
Tony PollardHB
73.0
Wan'Dale RobinsonWR
70.0
JC LathamT
69.9
Carnell TateWR
68.1
Cam WardQB
65.6
BAL
Lamar JacksonQB
91.4
Zay FlowersWR
87.2
Derrick HenryHB
75.2
Vega IoaneG
69.6
Rashod BatemanWR
68.9

QB Matchup

Each team's real current starting QB (per PFF's own depth chart) -- season-to-date PFF grades and passing profile, ranked against the league's other starters. A stat reads “—” when that player has no recorded snaps for it yet this season (e.g. just back from injury).

TENCam Ward
VS
BALTyler Huntley
TEN
65.6
20th / 35
Overall Grade
BAL
68.0
19th / 35
TEN
72.4
24th / 35
Clean Pocket Grade
BAL
68.2
29th / 35
TEN
53.1
9th / 35
Pressure Grade
BAL
64.5
4th / 35
TEN
1.6%
31st / 35
Big Time Throw %
BAL
1.3%
33rd / 35
TEN
2.8%
19th / 35
Turnover Worthy %
BAL
2.2%
11th / 35
TEN
2.96s
18th / 35
Avg Time To Throw
BAL
3.01s
22nd / 35
TEN
7.2
28th / 35
Avg Depth of Target
BAL
6.1
34th / 35

Efficiency and Scoring

Season-to-date EPA, success rate, and scoring, with each figure's league rank.

Offense
TENBAL
-0.1431st/32
EPA / Play
+0.107th/32
-0.1730th/32
EPA / Play (Passing)
+0.215th/32
-0.1020th/32
EPA / Play (Rushing)
-0.0313th/32
40.9%24th/32
Success Rate
49.9%5th/32
41.2%26th/32
Success Rate (Passing)
54.0%2nd/32
40.3%19th/32
Success Rate (Rushing)
44.9%7th/32
11.632nd/32
Points Per Game
29.26th/32
Defense
TENBAL
+0.0422nd/32
EPA / Play
-0.0313th/32
+0.1425th/32
EPA / Play (Passing)
-0.039th/32
-0.0814th/32
EPA / Play (Rushing)
-0.0322nd/32
45.3%20th/32
Success Rate
43.2%9th/32
50.0%25th/32
Success Rate (Passing)
43.5%5th/32
39.7%11th/32
Success Rate (Rushing)
42.8%20th/32
21.810th/32
Points Per Game
23.819th/32

Pressure Matchup

Each team's O-line pressure allowed against the other team's pass rush generated.

When Tennessee Titans have the ball
TEN pressure allowed32.7%9th of 32
→
BAL pressure generated36.6%19th of 32
When Baltimore Ravens have the ball
BAL pressure allowed38.5%23rd of 32
→
TEN pressure generated29.6%28th of 32

Team Grades

Both teams' own season-to-date PFF grades, side by side.

Grades ranked all 32 teams
TEN
63.0
31st / 32
Overall
BAL
82.2
2nd / 32
TEN
61.6
29th / 32
Offense
BAL
74.4
10th / 32
TEN
61.0
25th / 32
Defense
BAL
73.7
2nd / 32
TEN
70.4
25th / 32
Special Teams
BAL
90.1
6th / 32
TEN
53.8
27th / 32
Passing Offense
BAL
79.9
5th / 32
TEN
71.5
18th / 32
Rushing Offense
BAL
77.4
11th / 32
TEN
59.8
31st / 32
Receiving
BAL
76.8
6th / 32
TEN
64.2
14th / 32
Offensive Line
BAL
60.8
24th / 32
TEN
61.6
31st / 32
Pass Rush
BAL
65.4
27th / 32
TEN
52.1
24th / 32
Coverage
BAL
80.9
3rd / 32
TEN
65.9
9th / 32
Run Defense
BAL
65.5
10th / 32