ARI26
FINAL
14LAC
← back to predictions

Arizona Cardinals vs Los Angeles Chargers — Win Probability

FINAL
Arizona Cardinals logo
Arizona Cardinals
0-0
26
VS
Los Angeles Chargers logo
Los Angeles Chargers
0-0
14
Market line: LAC -9.5, total 47.5 · Model expected score: Arizona Cardinals 19.0 – Los Angeles Chargers 28.5
Ad space

Injury Report

The latest official designations and practice participation for both teams.

ARI
  • SDadrion Taylor-DemersonOut
  • CBGarrett WilliamsOut
  • GIsaiah AdamsOut
  • RBJeremiyah LoveQuestionable
  • PBlake GillikinFull
  • CBWill JohnsonFull
LAC
  • CBDeane LeonardOut
  • DETuli TuipulotuQuestionable
  • WRBrenen ThompsonFull
  • RBKeaton MitchellFull
  • SR.J. MickensFull

Prediction vs. Result

We keep every prediction permanently so we can always show our work.

PREGAME WIN PROBABILITY
Chargers 76%
ACTUAL RESULT
Arizona Cardinals won by 12
COMBINED SCORE
40

Arizona's 26-14 Win Over LA Defies Model Projection by 21.5 Points

The Arizona Cardinals pulled off a Week 1 upset, defeating the Los Angeles Chargers 26-14 in a result that deviated sharply from pregame expectations. The Cardinals won by 12 points and improved to 1-0, while the Chargers fell to 0-1.

Before kickoff, the model projected a Chargers victory by 9.5 points, with an expected final score of LAC 28.5, ARI 19. That projection aligned with the market line—the Chargers opened as 9.5-point favorites. The model gave Arizona only a 24% win probability, reflecting low confidence in an upset.

What actually happened swung the game decisively in Arizona's direction. The Cardinals outscored the Chargers 26-14, reversing the expected margin entirely. The actual 12-point Arizona margin versus the projected 9.5-point Chargers margin represents a 21.5-point swing from model expectations—a substantial miss.

Breaking this down: the model underestimated Arizona's offensive capability by roughly 7 points and overestimated Los Angeles' scoring by 14.5 points. That combined 21.5-point projection error is significant enough to signal either a fundamental misread of roster strength or game context, or an outlier performance that defied pre-game indicators.

The upset itself was not close—Arizona won convincingly. This was not a narrow one-score escape but a clear-cut victory. The model's 24% upset probability, while non-negligible, still undersold the possibility that materialized. For a brand built on factual accuracy, a miss of this magnitude in Week 1 warrants review of what inputs drove such a lopsided projection in the Chargers' favor.

Ad space

Margin of Victory — Los Angeles Chargers (Home)

Pregame odds for every possible outcome, simulated before kickoff -- the highlighted bar is what actually happened.

Lost / Tied ← actual result
24%
Won by 1-3
8%
Won by 4-7
11%
Won by 8-14
21%
Won by 15-21
18%
Won by 21+
19%

Total Score — Over / Under

Combined final score against five common lines, plus this game's actual market line -- the real combined score was 40.

O/U LINE 30
91% over ✓9% under
O/U LINE 40
71% over29% under ✓
O/U LINE 44
61% over39% under ✓
O/U LINE 47.5 MARKET LINE
50% over50% under ✓
O/U LINE 48
48% over52% under ✓
O/U LINE 52
37% over63% under ✓

Projected Margin Range — Los Angeles Chargers (Home)

Negative means Los Angeles Chargers lost by that many points. The shaded band is the 25th–75th percentile; the dot is the median.

P05: -12
Median: +10
P95: +31

Every number above comes from the model's live prediction data — 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations, grounded in the market line at generation time.

Ad space

Highest Graded Players

Season-to-date PFF grades for each team's top graded players, minimum 25% of that side's snaps.

ARI
Elijah HigginsTE
86.2
Jacoby BrissettQB
80.3
Paris Johnson Jr.T
77.6
Michael WilsonWR
73.9
Jon Gaines IIG
71.9
LAC
Ladd McConkeyWR
74.4
Rashawn SlaterT
73.7
Joe AltT
71.6
Travis BurkeT
70.5
Tre HarrisWR
64.9

QB Matchup

Each team's real current starting QB (per PFF's own depth chart) -- season-to-date PFF grades and passing profile, ranked against the league's other starters. A stat reads “—” when that player has no recorded snaps for it yet this season (e.g. just back from injury).

ARIJacoby Brissett
VS
LACJustin Herbert
ARI
80.3
10th / 35
Overall Grade
LAC
44.5
34th / 35
ARI
83.6
16th / 35
Clean Pocket Grade
LAC
56.9
34th / 35
ARI
45.8
17th / 35
Pressure Grade
LAC
29.1
32nd / 35
ARI
2.0%
30th / 35
Big Time Throw %
LAC
4.1%
14th / 35
ARI
2.3%
12th / 35
Turnover Worthy %
LAC
5.8%
33rd / 35
ARI
2.52s
2nd / 35
Avg Time To Throw
LAC
2.96s
18th / 35
ARI
7.4
27th / 35
Avg Depth of Target
LAC
8.6
14th / 35

Efficiency and Scoring

Season-to-date EPA, success rate, and scoring, with each figure's league rank.

Offense
ARILAC
-0.0216th/32
EPA / Play
-0.1932nd/32
-0.0021st/32
EPA / Play (Passing)
-0.2132nd/32
-0.0415th/32
EPA / Play (Rushing)
-0.1728th/32
49.0%8th/32
Success Rate
40.4%27th/32
51.6%8th/32
Success Rate (Passing)
41.1%27th/32
44.7%9th/32
Success Rate (Rushing)
39.5%23rd/32
21.623rd/32
Points Per Game
16.830th/32
Defense
ARILAC
+0.1129th/32
EPA / Play
-0.0316th/32
+0.2830th/32
EPA / Play (Passing)
+0.0117th/32
-0.109th/32
EPA / Play (Rushing)
-0.0615th/32
47.4%26th/32
Success Rate
43.6%11th/32
49.2%24th/32
Success Rate (Passing)
47.1%18th/32
45.2%28th/32
Success Rate (Rushing)
39.9%12th/32
32.432nd/32
Points Per Game
25.822nd/32

Pressure Matchup

Each team's O-line pressure allowed against the other team's pass rush generated.

When Arizona Cardinals have the ball
ARI pressure allowed25.8%1st of 32
→
LAC pressure generated37.0%15th of 32
When Los Angeles Chargers have the ball
LAC pressure allowed44.6%31st of 32
→
ARI pressure generated30.4%27th of 32

Team Grades

Both teams' own season-to-date PFF grades, side by side.

Grades ranked all 32 teams
ARI
76.6
11th / 32
Overall
LAC
64.4
29th / 32
ARI
80.5
1st / 32
Offense
LAC
56.4
31st / 32
ARI
51.4
32nd / 32
Defense
LAC
73.1
3rd / 32
ARI
91.2
3rd / 32
Special Teams
LAC
78.5
17th / 32
ARI
85.5
1st / 32
Passing Offense
LAC
42.2
32nd / 32
ARI
84.0
2nd / 32
Rushing Offense
LAC
71.8
17th / 32
ARI
77.5
3rd / 32
Receiving
LAC
58.8
32nd / 32
ARI
65.7
13th / 32
Offensive Line
LAC
57.0
30th / 32
ARI
68.2
20th / 32
Pass Rush
LAC
68.8
17th / 32
ARI
39.0
32nd / 32
Coverage
LAC
74.0
6th / 32
ARI
51.8
31st / 32
Run Defense
LAC
70.1
5th / 32